|
A Breath
Between |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Two interludes
employ aleatoric scoring in order to change the nature of visual/textual
prompts experienced by the performers. The expressive world of A Breath Between is a complex affair. I was attracted by the opportunity to construct an elaborate, albeit abstract, stage drama where two principal characters would each explore their own internal motivations simultaneously. The soloists’ activity is guided by a series of original texts which are not spoken but appear in the score as a means of providing a poetic climate in which to frame the musical material. There are two interludes – theatrical asides, if you will – where the music takes a radical departure from the narrative in order to muse on a pair of sculptures (one by Giacometti, the other by Calder). In addition, the soloists move to several locations around the hall over the course of the piece; thus introducing spatial, antiphonal, and theatrical aspects to the work. The term breath is a guiding metaphor that is woven into the work’s structure. The soloists "breathe" in their own space: their phrases overlap but rarely begin or end together, a feature which enhances the separate nature of their arguments. This staggered phrase structure is extended to the physical space of the auditorium, such that the interval between sound and silence becomes the distance between soloists and from the stage. As the soloists undertake separate journeys their changes in position mark a change in attitude and perspective, emphasis and accent. Rather than emerging in strict contrast materials evolve subtly over the course of the composition. The following outline denotes the overlapping, sectional structure of the work, where each new section indicates a change in the location where it is performed.
As I have noted, physical space – distance – is a meaningful feature in this music. Its precise meaning is open to interpretation, although it is worth describing the degree to which the space is used differently according to the soloists’ diverse personae. As the piece begins, the flute soloist is separated from the stage and the ensemble. The Flute’s music draws from the following text:
The
notion, then, of abandonment and isolation becomes a preoccupation for
the flute part, sometimes treated ironically, sometimes poignantly. The
rather severe isolation which is eventually felt by the Flute leads to
a fiercely introspective gaze; after all, ensemble connections are virtually
precluded by the radical separation from the stage. This inward perspective
eventually provides a linguistic foundation through which the Flute eventually
can engage with the ensemble and the violin, as a critical, sometimes
subversive voice.
The distance the violin soloist eventually gains from the ensemble is not as if it were cast out but rather as an attempt at providing a behavioral model for the ensemble to follow. Early in the work, the violin part addresses the following text:
Oddly, perhaps, the point of this foray is to express the value of an introspective attitude (words such as within, inward, and myopia appear repeatedly in the score). The Violin eventually finds a pedestal behind the ensemble, crystallizing a connection between ensemble and soloist where the Violin’s suggestions resonate. The rapport the Violin gains with the ensemble at this point is at the expense of the isolation the Flute experiences. When both soloists appear onstage in front of the ensemble, at the work’s Coda, they engage in what are simultaneously the most intense monologues as well as the clearest dialogue of the piece. This is not to suggest a resolution or compromise but rather to give a special status to direct engagement between these disparate personalities.
View Plans
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||